Saturday, May 5, 2012
Bureaucracy
Throw common sense and logic out the window. When you're mired in bureaucracy, there is little you can do.
So how does this pertain to real estate transactions?
First and foremost; real estate management companies are "the" poster child of bureaucracies. Multi-dwelling condos and co-ops are almost always managed by one of these outside real estate management companies. Among other things, they handle building expenses, collecting rents, common charges and/or maintenance fees, keep the books for the building and file paperwork with the city and other agencies. They are also instrumental in the approval process for sales and rentals. This sales/rental process is where the owner/seller/buyer/landlord/renter interacts with the management company directly.
Management companies generally do not share your concern for whether or not you have a roof over your head. If you are missing page 37 of document XYZ, your purchase/rental application will most likely be put on hold and work stops. If you're lucky, you're told of the problem. It's just as likely that when you haven't heard back from them in two weeks and call for a status report that only then will you find out that it was shelved weeks ago.
Anecdotes like the one above are not exaggerations, nor are they uncommon. Problems arise when clients refuse to accept that this can happen to them. "After all, if I'm spending $2,000,000 on this condo they should understand that a $47 discrepancy on my credit report is not important!" Well, yes you're right. And no, you're wrong. It's not common sense that rules the day, it's bureaucracy. The person processing your paperwork is more than likely an overwhelmed minimum wage employee with absolutely no discretion whatsoever in interpreting the "Big Picture". He or she has no concept or concern over "shades of gray".
So what is the answer? The answer is to not put yourself in a situation (if possible) where your paperwork is incomplete or sloppily submitted. Furthermore, you should allocate a sufficiently generous block of time (if possible) for the management company and/or board to review your paperwork.
This is classic example of why who you choose as your broker matters. This is grunt work, but it's critical to the success of your transaction. If your broker does the best job possible assembling your paperwork and couples it with polite, non-threatening communication with the management company, your chances of success will be greatly maximized.
Reach me at: michael.sussilleaux@gmail.com
Friday, April 27, 2012
"Full Ask"
But is it really wise to hold out for "Full Ask"?
Several years ago, when the real estate feeding frenzy was at it's peak, bidding wars were common and prices climbed every week. Sellers puffed out their chests and bragged that they got $200,000 over asking price. Interestingly, buyers also boasted that they "paid $200,000 over asking price, and I won!". In some markets brokers even adopted the strategy of deliberately listing the property well below market value in anticipation of a bidding war driving it far beyond what it was theoretically worth.
This strategy often worked. In that particular psychological climate buyer's fear of losing was so strong that they willingly overpaid just to keep their "competition" from winning. Seemingly odd behavior, but a surprisingly "human" reaction.
Times have changed. The market went through a dramatic swing when prices dropped drastically. Interestingly, you would think that stressed-out buyers nervous about committing to paying such a huge premium to own property would jump at the chance to buy at a 20-30% discount, but no -- they did not. They were scared and afraid. Logically you may ask "Would you like to buy the exact same property that was priced at 'x dollars' six months ago for only 80% of 'x' now?" but the answer was almost always "No".
Where are we today? It's neither a seller's nor a buyer's market. Most properties are priced reasonably and most trades are reasonably close to asking price, but almost invariably there's some wiggle room. You would be hard pressed to find someone today to pay full ask simply because they expect to negotiate.
As a seller you must consider this before you commit to an initial asking price. If you think your apartment is worth $1,000,000 it would be far wiser to list it at $1,050,000 or $1,100,000 and negotiate with a buyer than to list it at one million and expect full ask. The strategy may change over time, but that's the way it is now.
Summary: Markets change. You must to adapt.to them accordingly. Bucking the trend -- even if you think it makes sense -- is a recipe for failure. You can still achieve the same goals, it's just the method that requires flexibility.
Reach me at: michael.sussilleaux@gmail.com
Friday, January 6, 2012
Buying a Pied-à-Terre
Friday, October 21, 2011
Why Do You Want to Rent in New York City?
Example 1: You live in another city, and you're transferred to NYC. You have to start working here in 2 weeks. Your company will put you up in a hotel for a maximum of one month -- but politically you don't want to overstay your welcome on their dime.
The "why" in this example is obvious, but what's important are the constraints that accompany the "why". You have to find a place, and you have to find it quickly. You're expected to be at the office, so you have to optimize your time spent looking at apartments. You don't have a lot of lead time, so it's unlikely that you'll have the pick of the litter since the best apartments are often listed a minimum of one month prior to the earliest occupancy date. You don't have much time, you have to get in as soon as possible. You're most likely going to have to compromise in the interest of speed. You also have to have all your paperwork in order and ready to go, since you will have act quickly to lock up a place once you find it.
Example 2: You live with your parents in an upper-middle class suburb. You just graduated college, and your first job is with a non-profit downtown. It's time to strike out on your own and live the hipster life you've always dreamed of.
Again, the "why" is clear. Nevertheless, there are some real problems to work through. First, do you earn enough money to afford the apartment you want? Landlords typically require 40 times the rent in annual base salary. For a $2,000/month apartment, that's $80,000. If you don't make that, you will most likely have to ask your parents to act as guarantors. On the bright side, you don't "have" to move before midnight tonight, so you can be more particular in your search. If you find a great place that's only available two months from now, it could still work for you since you have shelter (however inconvenient).
The point of these two examples is to illustrate that every situation is different, and everyone will have flexibility in some areas, and severe constraints in others. It is important for you to realistically and honestly analyze your own financial situation, time frame and expectations before you hit the bricks. The most successful renters are adaptable to the ever-changing rental market and they know exactly what they can, and cannot afford.
Conversely, the least successful would-be renters are prisoners of their own flawed idea of how things "should" work and refuse to accept evidence to the contrary. If you're frustrated, still looking for that perfect place, and you've been through a number of "incompetent" brokers, it may be time to revisit your initial assumptions.
Reach me at: michael.sussilleaux@gmail.com
Wednesday, May 11, 2011
What I Want
This is a fairly common complaint with some buyers and renters. I'm always delicate in how I respond to clients who ask this, because this question runs much deeper than one would think.
The truthful answer -- which I am very unlikely to respond with in such direct terms is...
"Yes, I am listening to you, and the reason we can't find what you want is that it doesn't exist."
More often than not, this is an expression of frustration that ones' budget is not up to the level of ones' desires. Most buyers experience this unpleasantness to some extent, but most people come to terms with the reality of the situation and adjust their search criteria accordingly. The people who seem to have the most trouble accepting the limitations of their desires tend to be people from outside New York City who must adjust to a very different market than they're used to. Many of these people are very successful and are used to being among the "well-to-do" of their home region. It can be very difficult to accept the fact that a one-bedroom apartment can possibly cost as much as a 5 bedroom McMansion with a 3 car garage back home.
I honestly sympathize with people in this regard, and I understand that there is an education process in learning the specifics of a new market. Most people come around sooner or later, but there will always be that one person digging their heals in and insisting that... "You aren't listening to me! Why can't you find me what I want?"
Sometimes you just have to wish a client the best of luck and acknowledge that you are unable to provide the service they require, bid them a genuinely fond farewell, and recommend that they engage another brokers' services.
Reach me at: michael.sussilleaux@corcoran.com
Sunday, October 24, 2010
Deliberately uninformed, relentlessly so [a rant]

This is a post from "Seth's Blog", which I highly recommend to anyone in any industry. Check it out at http://sethgodin.typepad.com.
Many of those people have seen every single episode of American Idol. There is clearly a correlation here.
Access to knowledge, for the first time in history, is largely unimpeded for the middle class. Without effort or expense, it's possible to become informed if you choose. For less than your cable TV bill, you can buy and read an important book every week. Share the buying with six friends and it costs far less than coffee.
Or you can watch TV.
The thing is, watching TV has its benefits. It excuses you from the responsibility of having an informed opinion about things that matter. It gives you shallow opinions or false 'facts' that you can easily parrot to others that watch what you watch. It rarely unsettles our carefully self-induced calm and isolation from the world.
I got a note from someone the other day, in which she made it clear that she doesn't read non-fiction books or blogs related to her industry. And she seemed proud of this.
I was roped into an argument with someone who was sure that ear candling was a useful treatment. Had he read any medical articles on the topic? No. But he knew. Or said he did.
You see a lot of ostensibly smart people in airports, and it always surprises me how few of them use this downtime to actually become more informed. It's clearly a deliberate act--in our infoculture, it takes work not to expose yourself to interesting ideas, facts, news and points of view. Hal Varian at Google reports that the average person online spends seventy seconds a day reading online news. Ouch.
Not all books are correct or useful. Not all accepted science is correct. The conventional wisdom might just be wrong. But ignoring all of it because the truth is now fashionably situational and in the eye of the beholder is a lame alternative.
I know this rant is nothing new. In fact, people have been complaining about widespread willful ignorance since Brutus or Caesar or whoever invented the salad... the difference now is this: more people than ever are creators. More people than ever go to work to use their minds, not just their hands. And more people than ever have a platform to share their point of view. I think that raises the bar for our understanding of how the world works.
Let's assert for the moment that you get paid to create, manipulate or spread ideas. That you don't get paid to lift bricks or hammer steel. If you're in the idea business, what's going to improve your career, get you a better job, more respect or a happier day? Forgive me for suggesting (to those not curious enough to read this blog and others) that it might be reading blogs, books or even watching TED talks.
As for the deliberately uninformed, we can ignore them or we can reach out to them and hopefully start a pattern of people thinking for themselves..."
Reach me at: michael.sussilleaux@gmail.com
Saturday, July 10, 2010
What's a "Walk-Through"?
What is a "walk-through", and why is it important?A walk-through is a physical "inspection" of a property performed by the buyer just prior to the actual closing. Since it often takes months from the time that the buyer has last set foot in the property to the time of closing, a walk-though is an opportunity for the buyer to make sure that the property is in a condition consistent with when they last saw the property. It's a final opportunity just prior to closing to ensure that there is no egregious damage to the premises.
Note that the word "inspection" in the last paragraph is in quotes. Therein lies the rub.
Recently I had a walk-though where the buyer came in with a team of helpers and tested every appliance, the plumbing, all the electrical sockets, the windows, window coverings and inspected the walls, floors and ceilings for imperfections. Naturally this person wanted to make sure that she was getting everything in working order -- which is understandable. (By the way, everything was fine, and the closing went smoothly).
What isn't fine with the "fine toothed comb" approach is that in New York City, properties are generally sold "as-is". This means that if the chandelier didn't work when you signed the contract, there's no requirement for it to work now, just before you close on the property unless you specifically made contractual provisions for it to be fixed. The walk-through is not an engineering "inspection" to compile a punch list of things to be fixed by the seller. (In the special case of purchasing new construction, there really is a punch list, but not in the far more common resale of an existing apartment)
Had this woman found pinholes in the walls from picture hangers, faded paint or stains that were covered up by rugs, inoperative lighting fixtures, non-working air conditioners and almost anything else you can think of, she would most likely NOT be entitled to have the seller remedy these problems or compensate her in any way since the purchase is "as-is". This is a surefire way for there to be bad feelings and resentment at the closing table, and is most certainly not the way you want to begin life in your new home.
All this pain can be avoided. The time for this kind of detailed inspection is before the contract is signed, not after. Check the property out thoroughly before you sign on the dotted line! The walk-through is to verify that there is no unreasonable damage that wasn't there when the contract was signed and to ensure that there is a working smoke detector in the property. (The buyer must sign an affidavit that there is a working smoke detector at the closing, so I always make sure I call attention to it during my walk-throughs)
It is the responsibility of the real estate broker to educate their customers about what to expect from a walk-through. There's nothing "evil" about the sale being as-is, but it's important to know how you can meet all your expectations about what you're buying. Education makes all the difference.
Reach me at: michael.sussilleaux@gmail.com
Thursday, June 24, 2010
A Cautionary Tale
A couple recently signed a contract to purchase a modest apartment in New York City. They obtained financing, submitted all the required paperwork, and were good to go. They were all set to patiently wait the month or two that normally transpires between contract signing and closing. Since this was their first apartment, they decided to make use of this interim time to buy all new furniture so they could hit the ground running when they finally got the keys.
Finally, the time to close was upon them. Unfortunately for them, they didn't know that the bank giving them the mortgage runs their credit for a second time just before closing prior to approving the actual disbursement. Their furniture shopping spree created added debt for the couple, and it was enough to cause the bank to pull out of the deal, leaving the couple unable to close on the property and saddled with a ton of new furniture with no place to put it.
The moral of the story is clear. If you are buying a property, do not do anything that could adversely affect your credit rating/debt until after you have actually closed on the property. Make sure that you have a long talk with your mortgage broker about exactly how the process works so that you understand all your obligations and how to avoid pitfalls such as this.
Reach me at: michael.sussilleaux@gmail.com
Thursday, June 3, 2010
Summer is almost here!
Happy June to everyone!As you may know, summer is typically one of the busiest sales seasons of the year for residential real estate in
The resurgence of active buyers has also signaled a reduction in the median “days on market” before a property sells, although it is still takes an average of four to five months before a listed apartment actually closes. This is by no means the “irrationally exuberant“ market of 2004-2007 and while sales volume has returned, buyers are very discerning. The demand for any given property is driven by one dominant factor: PRICE!
Well priced apartments are attracting instant activity and occasionally multiple bids, while over-priced listings fail to generate real interest. When a newly listed apartment launches, all the serious, well informed buyers are able to very quickly weigh its attractiveness and appeal in comparison to other similarly priced listings. Readily available market data on the Internet continues to bring much needed transparency to the market, and no longer can a seller reasonably hope for an “uninformed” buyer to overpay for a property.
Looking forward, while no one has a crystal ball, it is fair to say that the latest market “bottom” is behind us.
Reach me at: michael.sussilleaux@gmail.com
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
Overpricing
I'll need 18 of those $1,000,000 bills thank you very much.A small townhouse of "quasi-historical significance" just came on the market in Brooklyn for $18,000,000. It's a small building. By suburban standards, it's minuscule. If this buildings' doppelganger were being sold in Buffalo, NY it might sell for $30,000 or so. Theoretically, you could by 600 of these in Buffalo for the same $18 million that this one in Brooklyn is listed for.
Does this mean that this $18,000,000 townhouse is overpriced?
Well, that's a tougher question than one may think. It really all depends on what someone is willing to pay for it. Comparable sales suggest that it is overpriced, but what is "quasi-historical significance" really worth? More importantly, if you are the seller of a "unique" property, how do you maximize your profit.
Consider the owner of this property. Perhaps a real estate broker came in and valued the townhouse at $4,000,000 based on comparable sales. Let's go wild and assume that ten brokers came in and valued it ranging from $3,000,000 to $5,000,000. Finally, the eleventh broker comes in and says that you can get $18,000,000 for the property. What do you do?
All things being equal, it seems the property is worth $4,000,000, but how can you possibly leave a potential windfall of $14,000,000 on the table? That's a very, very compelling reason to list the property in the stratosphere. Many of us buy lottery tickets, why shouldn't a rational human being try for the moon?
The problem is that if you go for the $18,000,000, and then reduce it to $15,000,000 and so on ... all the way down to $4,000,000 everyone will wait for it to go even lower because you'll have a white elephant that no one wants. You're facing quite a conundrum because the lure of the silly money is a tempting siren indeed. What's the answer?
The answer is this. If you are a seller and you are truly uncertain about the true value of your property because of extenuating circumstances such as "quasi-historical significance" your safest bet is to offer the Pollyanna broker the following: "I will let you list my property for $18,000,000 for 30 days. If you are correct, and this is the price point, everyone benefits. If you have misjudged the market and you are wrong, you are fired."
This protects you from brokers who are "buying the listing". Specifically, they simply want to get your listing whether or not the price is realistic. They do this to attract buyers to see the property who they then woo and guide them to other, more reasonably priced, listings. If they price your property ridiculously high, it is detrimental to them as well because frankly the buyers they're hoping to attract will be angry that they went on a wild goose chase for a clearly inferior property.
The moral:
The more unique and out of the ordinary your property is, the more important it is that you do your homework and try to get the most qualified sales team on your side.
Reach me at: michael.sussilleaux@gmail.com
Sunday, May 2, 2010
Missing in Action
Mea Culpa.It's been a long time since I've written a post. The reason is simply that I've been very busy with the business, and haven't allocated sufficient time to write.
So this is a placeholder. There's lots to talk about. I just have to do it.
Hang in there and as always, feel free to e-mail me if you have any questions. Thank you!
Reach me at: michael.sussilleaux@gmail.com
Saturday, January 16, 2010
Price per Square Foot
Here's a quick lesson on "Price per square foot", (or ppsf). Price per square foot is a very effective means of pricing property, particularly in large multi-dwelling buildings. The other day I was explaining how to utilize ppsf data to a client of mine, and she said "Oh, it's just like pricing diamonds!", and she is correct.One of the "4 C's" of pricing diamonds is "carat", or the physical size of the diamond. Small diamonds are obviously less expensive than larger ones, but as the diamond gets larger, the price increases ever faster.
For example, a 1/4 carat diamond of a given cut, color and clarity may sell for $200. A 1/2 carat diamond may sell for $500, a 1 carat for $1,300 and a 2 carat for $3,500! You can't simply add up the cost of four 1/2 carat diamonds to "equal" a single 2 carat diamond. The larger diamonds are simply much more valuable than the smaller ones.
The same pricing analogy is true of apartments. In a given location, for apartments of similar condition, the ppsf will vary considerably by size. A small studio apartment may sell for $700/sf, but a one bedroom in the same building may go for $800/sf and a two bedroom for $1,100/sf. Unfortunately for the buyer, the bigger apartment is not only more square feet to pay for, but each one of those square feet is more expensive! On the bright side, unlike diamonds, you can combine small apartments to make larger, more valuable ones. (But that's a topic for another post!)
Reach me at: michael.sussilleaux@gmail.com
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
2010
And so it goes. Another year begins, and we look forward, (and backwards), to get our bearings and plan for the future. 2009 showed a marked improvement in sales activity late in the year as buyers who were on the fence finally began to pull the trigger. The best apartments at the best prices are moving again, particularly in the studio and one-bedroom market.
What does 2010 hold? The future is always uncertain, but here are some of my thoughts:
- The Federal Reserve is currently slated to pare down their direct support for mortgages this spring, and it is likely that interest rates will rise from record lows over the course of the year.
- Inventory is down from its' record levels in 2009. It is not a sellers' market, but it's not so strong a buyers' market that buyers can unilaterally dictate terms. Many buyers have unfortunately lost out on properties they really liked because they pushed too hard and the sellers went elsewhere.
- Inflation is a growing concern across our entire economy, not just real estate.
- Be reasonable. You are not going to find the lone rube who is willing to pay 2007 prices for your apartment, nor will you be able to drive down a seller to accept 50% off the asking price because you are paying cash.
- Learn the market. Find out where prices are for properties that are in your realm of interest. That way you will be able to know what amount to bid to buy it, or what price to offer it for in the case of being a seller.
- Get an excellent real estate attorney. This past year I have seen more deals fall through because of bad lawyers than ever before. You stand to lose a boatload of money if there should be a problem and you have inadequate representation. Get a recommendation and under no circumstances should you use a friend or relative (read "cheaper fee") whose business is not primarily that of New York real estate.
Reach me at: michael.sussilleaux@gmail.com
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Should I Sell Now?
The answer to the question "Should I sell now?" depends very much on where you will be moving after you sell.Your answer will be very different depending on whether or not you're staying in the same area or relocating to a different real estate market.
There's a saying that helps answer this question for you; "All boats in the harbor rise and fall together with the tide". This simply means that in a given real estate market, when prices go up for one home, they go up for all homes and vice-versa.
Consider this: Is it better to sell in a rising or a falling market? If you will be buying in the same market after you sell, it's better to sell in a falling market. The reason is that you will be buying someone else's property at a price point that continues to drop in the declining market after you've sold your property and pulled your money safely off the table.
Conversely, if you sell in a rising market, you will be buying someone else's property at a higher price since it will continue to appreciate while your money is off the table after you've sold.
Naturally, if you are relocating you must consider the new market that you're moving to. It's an altogether different "harbor" in the boat analogy, and subject to different "tides".
This is only one factor to consider in the selling decision, but it's an important one. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about selling your property.
Reach me at: michael.sussilleaux@gmail.com
Thursday, September 24, 2009
Winds of Change
The market is shifting again. You'll read about it in the papers several months from now when all the current sales close, and the data is publicly available, but the shift is happening right now.Monday, August 3, 2009
When is the Perfect Time to Buy (or Sell)?
Time and timing. When it comes to real estate everyone wants to peer unerringly into the future, but our best laid plans are confounded by the fact that we are only privy to knowing with certainty what happened in the past.Interestingly, though not surprisingly, buyers want to buy at yesteryear's low prices, and sellers want to sell at the historic high-water mark (or even higher!). These "decisions" are often made without the slightest regard for what's going on in the real world. The old adage of "a property is worth exactly what someone is willing to pay for it" is a tough customer and can't be ignored.
No build-up here. The answer to the question of when is the "best" time to pull the trigger is this: Make the best decision you can based on the facts available to you at the time and the circumstances of your own situation. In a nutshell, be realistic and be reasonable and you will be rewarded.
I'm writing this on August 3, 2009. This happens to be a great time for buyers. (If you're selling to buy, then relax, as you too will hopefully be a buyer soon)
Why is it a great time for buyers?
- Prices are off an average of 10 to 20% or more from just a year ago. It's a genuine housing SALE.
- Inventory is abundant. The law of supply & demand reaffirmed!
- Prices have stabilized and deals are being done. (The volatility of the market has stabilized)
- Interest rates are at record lows! This is the real "Act before midnight tonight" motivator. Interest rates shouldn't be low at all. The money supply is increasing, which leads to inflation, which leads to higher interest rates. It's only a matter of time before interest rates start their inexorable climb.
Hey, I don't have a crystal ball, no one does, but if your situations is stable and you have the means, all the signs point towards great opportunity as a buyer.
Reach me at michael.sussilleaux@gmail.com
Thursday, June 11, 2009
Me, Myself & I
"I am the Platinum Club, Winner's Circle, Champion's Coven, Golden Halo, Diamond Award, Top Producer, Blazer of Excellence, Broker of the Century, Elite member of the top 1% of the top 5% in the Northeastern district of the top 7% of the entire United States of America! I'm amazing! Let me tell you even more about me! But enough about me, what do you think about me?"Yes, there's no subject more dear to many broker's hearts than themselves.
In defense of these peacocks, many potential clients -- having no better criteria of comparison -- opt for the broker with the most impressive achievement "flair". So while we all hate listening to these conceited asses blowing their own horns ... it seems to work!
So what should you be lookng for when interviewing a broker? Is it polite to shoot them with a water pistol when they won't shut up? (Answer: No, it's not polite, but it's darned funny)
Generally speaking, the broker will have some prepared material that he or she will go through in their presentation. This is important for sure, but while you're listening I recommend that you try and pick up clues beyond the specific content of the presentation.
- Does the broker convey the sense that he or she really knows what they're talking about? Communication -- in both directions -- is at the heart of this business. Maybe you're a "facts" person. Maybe you're a "feeling" person. Do you get the sense that the broker is comfortable speaking with you? More importantly, do you get the feeling that they would be equally comfortable speaking with someone who's not like you?
- Is there a reasonable intelligence beyond those flapping gums? Can the broker go "off script" comfortably and cogently?
- Ask them what differentiates them from their peers. If they are the "Universal Iridium Sales Challenge points leader for the Western Hemisphere", find out what differentiates them from all the other "Universal Iridium Sales Challenge points leaders of the Western Hemisphere"?
- How did he or she get all those listings? Was it by promising the moon? Or was it by demonstrating success over and over again?
- Who will physically attend to my needs? Mr. or Mrs. "Fifty Listings" is no doubt scouring the town for the 51st, and won't be able to serve cookies at your open house. Perhaps there is a team of dedicated professionals to support the load, but you won't know unless you ask.
- Who will be doing the negotiating on your property? This is big money; your big money. You deserve to know.
The lesson here is that choosing a broker is not simply a popularity contest, but it is entering in to a partnership with an agent who represents you and your interests to the best of their ability. Choose wisely!
Reach me at: michael.sussilleaux@gmail.com
Saturday, May 16, 2009
The Blog is Coming to Amazon's "Kindle" Platform
The blog is expanding! Amazon is trying to expand content for it's wireless reading tablet, "Kindle", so I decided to join their beta program and publish the blog on it.I've received so much positive feedback from you on the blog, that I want to do everything I can to expand readership. I think that Terra Firma is somewhat unique in it's approach, and that there's something in it for everyone.
Real estate transactions are almost certainly the largest financial transactions that you will ever be a party to, and while there is a plethora of "how-to" fodder available, I've always felt that the vast majority of it was sorely lacking in practical advice, and more importantly, a thorough analysis of how all the relevant parties interact, what their strengths and weaknesses are, and most importantly of all; what their true motivations and agendas are. (Whew, that was one long sentence)
So whether you're a faithful reader, or a new visitor, I urge you to take a peak back at previous posts for a refresher, and stay tuned for even more juicy tidbits of insight. Keep sending me those e-mails, and I'll do my best to reach out to all of you.
Reach me at: michael.sussilleaux@gmail.com
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
Bottoms Up!
How do you determine when the real estate market in your area hits bottom? Or, for that matter, how do you tell when it hits the top of the market? (The Million Dollar Question)
How do I accurately determine what the best time is for me to either buy or sell so that I get the very best deal possible?
Newspapers, magazines and television all report on the state of the real estate market, but there are two important limitations. First, they tend to deal with national data, which doesn't necessarily do you a lot of good. (Remember that real estate is a local phenomenon. If you didn't know that, or don't know why that's true, read this)
Second, sales statistics invariably report on the number of houses sold. On the face of it, it makes obvious and perfect sense, because what else can they report on? I am going to challenge this assumption, but first let's dig a little deeper in to this metric of "properties sold" and apply some common sense analysis.
The actual sale of a property is the last step of a long sales process. What are the components of this long process or "sales cycle"? (Specifically the time that transpires from the moment a sales agreement is reached to the actual closing and recording of the sale at the county clerk's office)
In my market, New York City, things probably work a bit differently than where you live simply because the overwhelming number of home sales represent condominiums and cooperative apartments and not stand alone houses. Condos and co-ops require lengthy submissions of personal and financial information followed by a review and approval process conducted by either the condo association or co-op board prior to the actual closing on the property.
Irrespective of the specific procedures applicable in your local market, most of the components of the sales cycle are the same. Typically, once an agreement is reached there is some form of down payment, an inspection, a mountain of paperwork, obtaining financing, submitting government filings, obtaining approvals, and finally scheduling a closing.
My experience is that the time from agreement on terms and conditions to closing is typically three to four months. At last! The transaction is complete.
Let's apply this three to four month time line to a hypothetical situation. You fall in love with a beautiful co-op apartment in the sweltering heat of late August and quickly reach an agreement with the seller of the property. The clock on the closing process starts ticking, and because from Thanksgiving through New Year's things slow to a crawl, the anticipated three to four months stretches to just over four, and you close the first week in January. Congratulations! You've just purchased a home in the first quarter of the next year!
Now let's get back to the media, and the sales figures they report to gauge where the market is. Where do they get the statistics? The answer is that they are either compiled by major real estate corporations or real estate data firms every quarter and published in "market reports". Your January sale will be bundled in the first quarter statistics that are released to the media in the beginning of April.
You may be thinking: "Whoa! Did he just say 'April'? I 'bought' that property in August the year before!"
And you would be correct.
Do you see the flaw in market news you get from the media? It's old. Very old. Too old.
SUMMARY
The message is that it's important to understand that the data used to report the direction the real estate market is moving is at best several months old, and isn't necessarily reflective of what's happening now in your local market. If you were to quantitatively know where the market is today, you would have a serious advantage over everyone else.
Reach me at: michael.sussilleaux@gmail.com
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Real Estate Myth Number 1: The Boutique Broker
Your luxury apartment or townhouse is genuinely spectacular. It's a multi-million dollar home, and when the time comes to sell it, you're not going to entrust the sale to just anyone. The broker who represents your property must be every bit as refined and pedigreed as your lovely home. This is clearly the milieu of the "Boutique Broker""Edwin Paddington Snodgrinckle" of "Snodgrinckle Elite Luxury Residences" is "the" most prestigious broker in the city -- or so you hear -- and fortunately for you he's been able to squeeze you in this Thursday so he can evaluate the suitability of your humble abode for inclusion in the Snodgrinckle stable of superior luxury homes.
Snodgrinckle arrives punctually, and nods casually at your tastefully decorated home. He remarks that it reminds him of the well appointed servant's quarters of the Rockefeller mansion; where he regularly attended black tie affairs when New York was "New York!".
Oh, it gets better. Old Edwin here has done $500,000,000 worth of business over his career and he conspiratorially -- "I really shouldn't tell you this, but ..." -- rattles off a gaggle of names from old New York Society whom he has represented.
Ask Mr. Snodgrinckle how he plans on marketing your property and he'll wax poetic about the thousands of buyers unique to his rolodex gathered over the course of his 45 years in the business. He'll also tell you that you'll get the best of both worlds; his premium service and the service of all the brokers in Manhattan since he distributes your listing to all the "big name" pedestrian firms.
Flushed with excitement from artfully spun tales of patrician hob-nobbing, and overwhelmed by his 45 years plus in the real estate business, you practically beg for the honor of having him represent your property.
Sounds like a dream come true to me, so what's the catch? Where is the myth?
- Unfortunately for you the Boutique Firm has no real advertising and marketing budget. They can not hope to reach the number of qualified buyers that the largest firms do. Instead they play up their "expertise" in your type of luxury property as if this will somehow mitigate the fact that they can't and don't advertise extensively. All the alleged expertise in the world is completely worthless if buyers aren't exposed to your listing.
- Their one page, out-of-date, homemade website; (if they even have a website); is virtually invisible to anyone searching for a property. It may appear on page 2,137 of a Google search, but who realistically looks past page 2 (at most) of the results? No buyer searching for a luxury property is ever going to find your listing on the Internet.
- The only advertising you will likely get with a boutique firm is the occasional ad in the New York Times. Unfortunately the role of the Times as the "New York Real Estate Bible" has almost completely evaporated in recent years along with its precipitous decline in circulation. My listings typically attract over 10 times the number of visitors to my company website than I receive on the Times site! (Yes, the big firms advertise on the Times too -- we have the budget to advertise on many, many venues.)
- While it (should) be true that Mr. Snodgrinckle will share the listing with other brokerage firms, the other firms will not advertise it on their multi-million dollar prominent websites, nor will they publish it in magazines, newspapers and international venues since it's not their listing. Since all the major firms share their listings, it begs the question why not invest your $500,000 commission with a firm that can actually promote your listing around the city, country and world, since all the one-man-bands like Snodgrinckle will still receive the listing information anyway?
- Mr. Snodgrinckle almost certainly has a rolodex, but buyers at this level do not "belong" to one broker. If you're a player in New York real estate, you appear in many rolodexes. When your listing is disseminated among all the brokers in New York, you can be absolutely sure that Mr. Snodgrinckle, all the other "boutique brokers" and all the brokers from the big firms will be on the phone to their best buyers within seconds because each one of them will be competing to be the first to reach the big players and therefore share in the co-broke commission.
- Today's buyer is younger, more educated and computer savvy. They do not read print ads. They use the Internet, and they search on their own. Having no public presence other than a newspaper ad borders on ludicrous. You would be doing yourself a egregious disservice by not doing all you can to reach these buyers.
- Snodgrinckle's track record of success over 45 years is most likely just that: Snodgrinckle's success, not his seller's! If Snodgrinckle sells a $10,000,000 townhouse directly to someone on his rolodex, he collects $600,000. That's a tidy sum. But what if more buyers saw the property? Buyers not in Snodgrinckle's rolodex, but instead brought by a co-broker? Maybe the townhouse would have gone for $12,000,000. In this case Snodrinckle would "only" make $360,000 since he would be splitting the commission with a co-broker who brought the buyer to the deal. Can you see how it's in Snodgrinckle's best interest; and specifically not in your best interest; to keep the deal close to the vest?
Reach me at: michael.sussilleaux@gmail.com




